Author Topic: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt  (Read 1376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« on: September 24, 2017 04:53:28 PM »
 I got to looking at this and similar boards after deciding to fight Midland Finance in court and when I started getting texts from 3 different numbers with the same messages, "a homeowner in X needs her bathroom remodeled", (4 past 9 p.m. local). Replied STOP. Texts continued. Just started taking screen shots after that. Before it started making me mad, I deleted quite a few, so I ended up with 6 texts. Found the company, verified all the numbers were indeed associated with them and sent an ITS email followed up with a printed one sent CMRR.
The CEO emailed an I'm sorry, we won't do it again. Yeah. Not gonna work. In those 6 texts, I'm hopeful I can get treble award; three texts after telling them to stop, (the text even said, "we'll stop texting but there's a homeowner in X.....), a text at 9:39 p.m., 9:59 p.m., and 10:30 p.m.
 Their lawyer called and followed up with an email on Friday and wants to set up a call for next week so he can "get a little more detail about what happened". I've got my ducks in a row,a and although I know everyone says treble is hard to get and your phone isn't proof, I'm pretty confident that what documentation I have is enough for a few grand.

kevinmanheim

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11515
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2017 05:32:06 PM »
Forget about treble. You will not get it in court without a fight that will take more time than the win will be worth.

They want to talk so they can determine how skilled you are, and how well you could do in court. Size you up.

I would make a lot of talk about the treble damages, but be prepared to settle for a max of $500 per call.

Considering it's a small number of calls, I would look to settle for $2,500.

fisthardcheese

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 3840
  • They forced arbitration into your contract. Use it
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2017 08:28:01 PM »
Forget about treble. You will not get it in court without a fight that will take more time than the win will be worth.

They want to talk so they can determine how skilled you are, and how well you could do in court. Size you up.

I would make a lot of talk about the treble damages, but be prepared to settle for a max of $500 per call.

Considering it's a small number of calls, I would look to settle for $2,500.

Kevin is right, you will likely only be able to settle for $500 per call/text.

If this were me, I would email the attorney my screen shots of the 6 texts and let him know that I currently have preserved 6 texts and 3 were after a request to stop.  I would tell him that I know of X more texts that I did not preserve but will recover through phone records and his clients records during discovery, however if he wishes to settle prior to my filing in court, that I will agree to settle for $6,000 representing the 6 texts I currently have preserved with 3 of them being trebled for willful violations after asking to stop.

I would then expect him to come back with a lowball offer and bat numbers back and forth with hopes of meeting around $2500 - $3000.
11 Arb Settlements (9 AAA, 2 JAMS)
3 JDB Suits Dismissed With Prejudice (2 pro-se, 1 consumer atty)
3 TCPA Settlements (2 pro-se, 1 consumer atty)
2 FCRA Settlements (consumer atty)
1 FDCPA Settlement (w consumer atty)
1 Small Claims Win (pro-se; Landlord/state consumer law violations)
1 State UDAP Settlement (ITS)
1 Federal PTC Settlement (before hearing; pro-se)

username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2017 09:47:13 PM »
Kevin is right, you will likely only be able to settle for $500 per call/text.

If this were me, I would email the attorney my screen shots of the 6 texts and let him know that I currently have preserved 6 texts and 3 were after a request to stop.  I would tell him that I know of X more texts that I did not preserve but will recover through phone records and his clients records during discovery, however if he wishes to settle prior to my filing in court, that I will agree to settle for $6,000 representing the 6 texts I currently have preserved with 3 of them being trebled for willful violations after asking to stop.

I would then expect him to come back with a lowball offer and bat numbers back and forth with hopes of meeting around $2500 - $3000.

I did just that, along with a chronological timeline of what calls by which numbers.
Even if a business doesn't know about the TCPA and what it entails, everyone knows you aren't allowed to contact past 9 p.m. and that's pretty willful. Even if I can't, it's only cost me a few hours of time and $6 to send the ITS.

aaabbb

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 60
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2017 10:46:59 PM »
There is no reason not to seek treble damages. Receiving calls after 9pm is as strong of an argument that can be made in favor of treble damages. Violations like that are almost unheard of and there's no excuse for them. If the texts are actually autodialed and you can prove it they will lose and you should ask for $3,000 per call; $1,500 for section (b) and $1,500 for section (c).

That said, it sounds like they might not be using an autodialer to send the text messages. When you say they responded to your request to stop, it sounds like they sent a custom worded response. If that's the case, some or all of the texts may have been sent "manually".

If that's true, you can't sue them under section (b) of the TCPA but you can still sue under section (c) if the calls are telemarketing calls, and it sounds like they are. Section (c), however, is quite a bit more lenient on callers than the autodialer restrictions are under section (b) because it gives callers an extra defense; due care. Telemarketers won't be held liable for violating section (c) if they have implemented policies and procedures with due care to abide by the FCC regulations. The Defense will argue that they have the proper policies and procedures in place, and you should argue that they have not implemented them (or exercised due care) because they called you three times after 9pm and three times after asking to stop.

If I were you, I would get a recorder and call the company (a number that connects you with a low level telemarketing agent) and ask to be mailed a copy of their policies and procedures for maintaining a do not call list. Hopefully their employee will have no clue what you are talking about. This recording can then be used as additional evidence that they have not effectively implemented their policies and procedures with due care.

Section (c) also provides a "reasonable time" defense to stop calling. This time period cannot exceed 30 days. If the calls stopped before 30 days after you asked to stop, then they can argue that they are not liable because they stopped calling within a "reasonable" period of time. This defense will not help them on the calls that occurred after 9pm, though.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2017 11:09:18 PM by aaabbb »

username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2017 11:33:53 PM »
There is no reason not to seek treble damages. Receiving calls after 9pm is as strong of an argument that can be made in favor of treble damages. Violations like that are almost unheard of and there's no excuse for them. If the texts are actually autodialed and you can prove it they will lose and you should ask for $3,000 per call; $1,500 for section (b) and $1,500 for section (c).

That said, it sounds like they might not be using an autodialer to send the text messages. When you say they responded to your request to stop, it sounds like they sent a custom worded response. If that's the case, some or all of the texts may have been sent "manually".

If that's true, you can't sue them under section (b) of the TCPA but you can still sue under section (c) if the calls are telemarketing calls, and it sounds like they are. Section (c), however, is quite a bit more lenient on callers than the autodialer restrictions are under section (b) because it gives callers an extra defense; due care. Telemarketers won't be held liable for violating section (c) if they have implemented policies and procedures with due care to abide by the FCC regulations. The Defense will argue that they have the proper policies and procedures in place, and you should argue that they have not implemented them (or exercised due care) because they called you three times after 9pm and three times after asking to stop.

If I were you, I would get a recorder and call the company (a number that connects you with a low level telemarketing agent) and ask to be mailed a copy of their policies and procedures for maintaining a do not call list. Hopefully their employee will have no clue what you are talking about. This recording can then be used as additional evidence that they have not effectively implemented their policies and procedures with due care.

Section (c) also provides a "reasonable time" defense to stop calling. This time period cannot exceed 30 days. If the calls stopped before 30 days after you asked to stop, then they can argue that they are not liable because they stopped calling within a "reasonable" period of time. This defense will not help them on the calls that occurred after 9pm, though.

 I believe, and based on wording and how their texts are worded that they have an auto-reply feature. They are an app-based business that sells leads for construction contractors. I haven't delved into the TCPA and auto-reply texts, but if it can auto-reply, I'm betting it has the capacity to store and so on.
 I don't think they have a policy. I requested one but the fella hemmed and hawed around. I'll be sure to ask his attorney to provide that for me.
 My thought is, ask for $6k, set my basement for $3500, and if they don't want to play ball, I file in state court in Missouri. Heck of a drive from California.

aaabbb

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 60
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2017 12:58:52 AM »
Quote
I'll be sure to ask his attorney to provide that for me.
Whatever you do, don't do this. If they don't have a policy and you ask the attorney, they will suddenly have a policy. Instead, ask a low level employee and record their clueless response. Don't even bring this up unless you go to court.

I suggest you stop talking to his attorney all together. Give them your evidence and a settlement offer and don't talk to them again unless they are negotiating with you on the settlement offer.

username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2017 01:45:04 AM »
That's actually sound advice. Of course, being so green in this stuff, I'm uber-confident in what I have to prove my side and kinda want to say, "yeah. That's right. I got this".  Pride cometh before the fall.
 I totally see what you're saying. I did send him an email basically telling him instead of spending 30 minutes on a phone call where he can transcribe what I'm saying; here's what I got. I sent him transcripts of the texts along with time and originating number, (I did make sure to include the one that shows the 9:30 p.m. text. Although, since sending that email, I did find three more instances on my cell bill of them texting me. Don't know if that changes anything, but now, instead of 9 potential, I have 12. Also, I don't know if this has any bearing on what may be, but isn't it borderline harassment to text 5 times in a hour after being told to cease? Again, in my world, if it ticks me off, it oughta be illegal. If it ticks me off, it's a bit much.
 Should I email him and include the three to bolster what I may have or ......?
 Thanks for the advice.

CleaningUp

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 10678
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2017 02:06:44 AM »
If they have an attorney on the case, you are violating at least the ethical part of communication on legal matters.

Once an attorney is handling their matters, you deal with the attorney, not the attorney's client.

As for harassment?  How are you going to prove intent?

As for you getting angry being equal to a violation of law? 

Don't be stupid in your pursuit of a payday!  THAT is pure stupidity coupled with a terminal degree of ignorance.  If you play that card, you assure yourself of not being taken seriously by anyone on their side and the court that you are going to have to ask to resolve your case.


username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2017 02:14:59 AM »
I'm pretty sure I qualified my statements. There's a difference between believing it should be and it being so.

aaabbb

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 60
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2017 06:46:34 AM »

As for harassment?  How are you going to prove intent?

As for you getting angry being equal to a violation of law? 

TCPA complaints written by consumer attorneys usually allege both of these things, especially post Spokeo. You will have to plead in such a way that demonstrates some sort of harm so you are not just citing bare procedural violations. Of course, it's better to cite the money spent on wasted minutes or the electricity used to charge a depleted cell battery but the complaints that I have seen, drafted by actual consumer attorneys, have included language about "harassing phone calls".

fisthardcheese

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 3840
  • They forced arbitration into your contract. Use it
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2017 11:10:40 AM »
isn't it borderline harassment to text 5 times in a hour after being told to cease? Again, in my world, if it ticks me off, it oughta be illegal. If it ticks me off, it's a bit much.

Looks to me like you have concrete actual, emotional damages here.  If this goes to court, I would detail how frustrated and angry you have been about this harassment of several texts within an hour and multiple texts after 9pm.
11 Arb Settlements (9 AAA, 2 JAMS)
3 JDB Suits Dismissed With Prejudice (2 pro-se, 1 consumer atty)
3 TCPA Settlements (2 pro-se, 1 consumer atty)
2 FCRA Settlements (consumer atty)
1 FDCPA Settlement (w consumer atty)
1 Small Claims Win (pro-se; Landlord/state consumer law violations)
1 State UDAP Settlement (ITS)
1 Federal PTC Settlement (before hearing; pro-se)

username_taken

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2017 03:27:27 AM »
Looks to me like you have concrete actual, emotional damages here.  If this goes to court, I would detail how frustrated and angry you have been about this harassment of several texts within an hour and multiple texts after 9pm.

I now have a total of 14 "violations" of which their attorney has my documentation. I am not so stupid as to think I can make them all stick or get treble damages, but it's a danged good negotiating position. They're in CA, I'm in MO. Local counsel would cost them what I'm asking. Not to mention the flagrant violations. The last text I received on Aug 21, 2017 at 9:30 p.m. resulted in a reply about this being the 4th time I've asked to stop being contacted and informing the sender that they were in violation of the TCPA. That was the last one from that number, but at 8:26 a.m. the next morning, there was another text from the same company. So, I'm pretty confident, given what I have vs what they will have to try and disprove, that I'm in the proverbial catbird seat. Not cocky, but when they hand it to you with a ribbon, you take it.

BTW, about the frustrated and angry part, my wife works in TN and I'm in MO. (awesome job offer, couldn't pass it up). I go to bed at 9 and get up at 4:30 a.m. cause we have a small farm. Everyone who knows me knows not to call or text past 9. Anything beyond that is an emergency. Honestly, I've been getting this stuff for 5 years because we are an LLC. This one pushed me over the edge. I usually just deleted and went on, but this one ticked me off. In 24 hours I got 9 texts from these people. Sick of it.
 So, if anyone feels like holding a newbies hand through this, I can take criticism, so long as it constructive. Not really interested in anyone who just wants to tell me how wrong I am. I got a wife for that.

kevinmanheim

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 11515
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2017 03:48:45 PM »
Most companies, when schooled by a consumer about consumer-protection laws, take that schooling as an indication the consumer doesn't know what they are doing.

Stop trying to school your opponent. They know the TCPA and all other consumer statutes.

They also know you are unlikely to actually sue.

They also know that, if you do sue, you are unlikely to know how to obtain ADMISSIBLE evidence to prosecute your claims.

They don't need to disprove your claims. You need to prove them. Your records are not proof of TCPA violations.

In the meantime, they continue to listen to you spout off, waiting for you to do something that will destroy your case.

If you feel they owe you money for TCPA violations, why are you yelling at them to stop running the TCPA meter? Each extra call is $500-1,500.

Be quiet. You already told them to stop calling.

Sue. Before you do, learn how to obtain admissible evidence.

CleaningUp

  • Valued Member
  • Posts: 10678
Re: Quick Rundown on my TCPA Attempt
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2017 05:39:20 PM »
If you don't like the advice that you are being given, hire your own lawyer.

At least the know what the Rules of Evidence require to be able to get the evidence admitted at trial.


 

credit